The “Treaties of Rome” and the development of the Common Agricultural Policy
نویسنده
چکیده
After the Second World War, with food supplies being badly insufficient, the “Marshall Plan” as well as a policy of high producer prices provided incentives to reconstruct the agricultural production potential in Western Europe. Soon production surpluses began to emerge, and despite the high price levels farm incomes did not rise in proportion to production and productivity. Already in 1950 a debate about the organization of common agricultural markets in Europe began to develop. This paper describes the development of the Common Agricultural Policy, starting from these discussions until the implementation of the first market organizations in the early 1960s. The Treaty of Rome is seen as the formal trigger for creating a “Common Agricultural Policy” among the six founding members. Furthermore, it tries to identify impacts of the short tem oriented fixes for actual problems in this period on key deficiencies of the CAP in the long run. Here the indistinctness with respect to important long term agricultural issues of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC) are a possible starting point. These shortcomings could not be fixed in the subsequent Stresa Conference, which tried to work out the basic outline of the CAP. The paper basically identifies two interrelated deficiencies of the early CAP as being most influential for the often disputed long term evolvement of this policy area: (i) the inability to take a decision on the “correct” support level, and (ii) the lack of a realistic structural policy objective. More or less all attempts to fix these weaknesses of the CAP in a balanced way failed. Short term-oriented and often cost-inefficient solutions dominated the subsequent development of the CAP. Examples supporting this finding are, among others, the decisions with respect to the harmonization of the common price level in the following years, the biased management of the exchange rate differences through the so called “Agrimonetary System”, or the way of introducing direct payments with and after the MacSharry Reform of 1992.
منابع مشابه
The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?
Public health instruments have been under constant development and renewal for decades. International legal instruments, with their binding character and strength, have a special place in this development. The start of the 21st century saw, in particular, the birth of the first World Health Organization (WHO)-era health treaties – the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) and i...
متن کاملTrade Policy and Health: Adding Retrospective Studies to the Research Agenda; Comment on “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?”
Prospective studies of the potential health consequences of trade and investment treaties, such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, are critical. These studies can make visible to trade policy-makers the potential negative impacts associated to such treaties and can influence the outcomes of such negotiations. However, few researchers have examined retrospectively the consequences of trade agreem...
متن کاملSocio-economic Impacts of Investment Development Policy on the Agricultural Sector
Investment in the agricultural sector is important because this sector greatly affects the realms of providing food independence and security, employment, sustainable development, and environmental preservation. So, this study investigated the socio-economic impacts (direct and indirect effects) of the investment development policy on the agricultural sector and its sub-sectors in Iran in 2011 ...
متن کاملInnovative Use of the Law to Address Complex Global Health Problems; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”
Addressing the increasingly globalised determinants of many important problems affecting human health is a complex task requiring collective action. We suggest that part of the solution to addressing intractable global health issues indeed lies with the role of new legal instruments in the form of globally binding treaties, as described in the recent article of Nikogosian and Kickbusch. However...
متن کاملHuman Rights Treaties Are an Important Part of the “International Health Instrumentariam”; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”
In their commentary, Haik Nikogosian and Ilona Kickbusch argue for the necessity of new binding international legal instruments for health to address complex health determinants and offer a cogent analysis of the implications of such treaties for future global health governance. Yet in doing so they pay no attention to the existing instrumentarium of international legally binding treaties relev...
متن کامل